Along Montana's Rocky Mountain Front
September Blog

This month: NCDE Grizzly Bear population study final numbers, articles and press releases; Missoula black bears and grizzlies
Email this page, bookmark it, or use
your [rss] reader.
September
An article from the Choteau Acantha on the seemingly inevitable fall conflicts, what with the growing numbers of bears, the seasonal changes in available natural foods and hunting season bringing people into bear habitat:
From the 9/20/08 Choteau Acantha: Autumn brings grizzly conflicts up, down Front After a relatively quiet summer, grizzly bear and human or livestock conflicts on the Rocky Mountain Front are on the rise as food sources dwindle and bears try to put on as much weight as possible before denning in October and November. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks grizzly bear management specialist Mike Madel of Choteau and U.S.D.A. Wildlife Services trappers Mike Hoggan of Valier and Jim Stevens of Augusta have been busy in recent weeks, responding to suspected grizzly-bear livestock depredations from Dupuyer to Choteau to Augusta. The "big news" this month is the results of the Northern Divide Grizzly Bear
Project. It's been anticipated for some time, delayed by the slow speed of lab work (and presumably other factors). The formal study will be published in the January edition of the Journal of Wildlife Management. Two news articles: From the 9/17/08 Daily Inter Lake: DNA study doubles bear census The estimate is in: There were 765 grizzly bears roaming the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem during the summer of 2004. That’s the official result of an ambitious and unprecedented genetic study of the largest grizzly bear population in the lower 48 states.... From the 9/17/08 Great Falls Tribune: Study: Grizzlies' range has expanded The study found the genetic diversity of the bears here is as high as it is in undisturbed populations of bears in remote areas of Canada and Alaska. In fact, there's no evidence the connection between bears in Canada and northwest Montana has ever been broken. The connection to Canada gives northwest Montana's bear population, which study leader (Kate Kendall of the U.S. Geological Survey) said has been growing since 1976, the best long-term chance of survival of bears in the Lower 48.... An Op-Ed from the 9/18/08 Daily Inter Lake: When politics and science collide Montanans should be proud of an unprecedented grizzly bear population census that was recently completed in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem. And press releases from Montana FWP and the USGS: From Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (9/18/08): State Wildlife Officials Applaud Grizzly Bear DNA Study "The study shows that northwestern Montana’s grizzly bear population is healthy, growing, and genetically diverse," said Jeff Hagener, director of Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks. "For the 765 grizzly bears in the NCDE—more than twice as many as thought to live there just four years ago—it appears the prospects for their long-term survival are excellent." From the USGS (9/16/08): New study estimates 765 grizzly bears reside in northwest Montana A new study estimates that 765 grizzly bears make their home in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, a 7.8 million acre area in northwest Montana stretching from north of Missoula, Mont., to the Canadian border.... A Missoula blog about black bears and the possibility of grizzlies around town Years ago, I first got interested in bears from what I saw around Missoula, in the Rattlesnakes just outside of town, and in the Bitterroots down south. I'd heard of black bears in backyards in town, and found scat and bedding areas myself along Rattlesnake Creek, and even the remains of white tail fawns, which black bears are good at catching in the spring. But the time I remember that really got me interested was one morning in the Rattlesnake Wilderness when I nearly stepped on a cinnamon colored black bear. I was running downhill on a trail in the rain, and I was keeping my eyes on the slick trail and carefully - and as it turns out, too quietly - putting my feet down. I came around a bend in the trail, and there it was. We both jumped in fright; it must have been funny to see. In a flash, the bear scampered uphill, stopping twice to look back, as I bent over to catch my breath over the adrenaline. I twice remember catching its eye through the branches and brush, before it turned its head each time to bolt away, and before I could swallow my heart back down from around my tonsils, it cleared the top of the rise and was gone. I remember the look in the eye, the way it didn't seem to break off its gaze from fear, but turned away with certainty, just to stop and once again. I can't claim to have seen intelligence or interest or curiosity, but I did see something more than a dead, colorless gaze like a marble; there was something there, other than fear. (I've seen been told that looking a bear in the eye like that is acting aggressively, which you don't want to do; and if I ever am that close to a bear again, I think I naturally will drop my gaze without any thought.) It was a pretty cinnamon color, bright even in the dark, rainy morning. It was small and young, and afterward I assumed it was a black bear; that was back when I knew little about the difference between blacks and grizzlies. I suppose it could have been a grizzly, as I trail I was on wasn't maintained and was little known outside a group of friends, and this was the Rattlesnake Wilderness, after all. Cinnamon colored black bears aren't unusual, but such a light colored cinnamon could have been a griz. But I didn't know enough to look for the shape of the face or its back. And I was too startled to follow the footprints up hill and see if I could tell anything more, though later, I wish I had. And walking in the Bitterroots, seeing bear sign and hearing animals move in the trees as I bushwhacked up and down ridges, I wondered if any grizzlies were left. The last grizzly was hunted in the 1940's, though there have been sightings reported since then. An attempt to reintroduce grizzlies to their native range of Bitterroots in 2001 was sidelined by national politics. The Bitterroots are great habitat: the largest wilderness area in the lower 48, high rocky peaks and miles of isolation. Each time I was way up in the glacial cirques of silver rock and bright lakes, deep grass and wildflowers, I just assumed there were grizzlies in the Bitterroots. (A great book about the Montana and Idaho Bitterroots, with lots of information about grizzlies is The Lochsa Story: Land Ethics in the Bitterroot Mountains, by Bud Moore, longtime Forest Service Ranger, hunter and conservationist, in the traditional sense of the word). Here in Missoula, this month seasons are changing and most animals are busy. The first cold mornings have come and gone with the smell of smoke from fires in the dew. Yellow jackets are getting friendly, instinct telling them the end is near. Chickadees are knocking around the lilacs and plum trees, looking for seeds they stashed earlier under the lips of bark, and arguing with sharp dee dee dee's. Yesterday, two big Pileated Woodpeckers hammered away at deadwood near the top of the 100 year old willow out front, chopping from the left, pausing and then hammering from the right, dropping chunks of wood light as paper.
We've had a few days of what I call thick rain - small misty drops from a cold front, not heavy like a summer thunderstorm. Thick rain means snow up high. Big piles of bear scat - black bear - jammed with chokecherries are in the trails in the Rattlesnake Valley right now. This year all the wild berry crops were good even if they were a bit late, saved by the good snowpack and early spring rains. Good berry crops mean bears will keep busy in the mountains loading up with natural foods for hibernation, and will come down later into the valleys looking for food. In the North Hills, the open prairie foothills to the Rattlesnakes, there is a Hawthorne Grove in the middle of one slope, and under the trees the scat piles are nearly six inches tall. How the Hawthornes got there is hard to say, but near the grove of a dozen trees is a tiny spring fed pond. And around the acres of the open slope are a few rectangular piles of rocks, low to the ground that look like grave markers. One or more of the trees might have been planted back in homesteading days, and the seeds were scattered in bear scat, the grove slowly growing outward. Might seem to strange to write about or notice so much bear scat, but that's one of the few ways we know bears are around. And, besides, we can learn lots of scat; there are scientists who spend years studying scats. (Bear scat doesn't usually smell bad; it's the result of a diet mostly of grasses, roots and berries). Last week, I spotted a black bear running in Cherry Gulch, which is lower down from the Rattlesnakes and inside the city limits. Blue, my Australian-cross scented it before I saw it, as she ran across the bottom and back, pointing into the breeze coming down the gulch, and I could tell what she smelled something other than a deer. There is a red fox in the gulch, and some early mornings she has scented it, and we have stopped and stared at each other, my Blue pointing and wanting to chase, the fox quietly sitting, facing us with her black face, deep red flanks, white tipped tail, watching to see what we do. Usually quietly watching us until we leave. But this was a small black bear, running the ridge top. When I first saw it up in the pines near the ridge top, I thought the shape was the head and shoulders of another walker. But then it dropped to its front legs and ran, and then I knew it had been sitting on its haunches, watching me and Blue. I went up the slope, called Blue back to walk with me, and saw it galloping down the hill, into the open. It stopped once again before dropping down into the trees at the edge of Duncan Drive. Brown nose, deep black fur; it quickly turned its head out of fear and fell to its front paws to run, hind legs overtaking front paws on the head long rush down the hill to cover.
It's nothing new to observe, but bears look human-like, appear something like us in action and in gait and facial expressions. Maybe that's why people are fascinated by bears; maybe as humans we are species lonely, and we are always looking for other animals to be around us. Every other animal has another close by in terms of species: birds have thousands of species close by, ungulates like deer and elk have others, and other predators like wolves and cats have relatives. We've been species lonely for a hundred thousand years. Jamie Jonkel, the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Wildlife Management Specialist for Region 2 (this area) told me that Cherry Gulch has more bear traffic than some parts of Glacier Park, and I can see that. (That's also why he has a culvert trap at the mouth of the gulch where it crosses Duncan Drive.) There are well traveled trails in the brush and cottonwoods of the bottom, wide enough for a bear. Walking along, there are bits of hair on logs the bears step over, bits on branches, scats and small bedding areas like nests. I found one of those plastic honey squeeze containers from the grocery store, shaped like a bear, with tooth marks all the way through it. Must have been a funny sight, seeing a bear carrying a bear shaped honey container away from a garbage can. And, in the leaves next to plastic bear was a light bulb. Dark and burned out, but whole. How did a light bulb - unbroken - get out there? It must have been carried by the bear. What did the bear think? That it was food? A toy? On a sunny day, Cherry Gulch sees hundreds of people walking and running and dozens of dogs. Once I sat above the trail and watched the fox family across the gulch, and also watched a dozen people and dogs walk right below me, and no one knew the foxes were close by. In Cherry Gulch, bears see far more people than people see them. Cherry Gulch might be the first place a grizzly is spotted near town. If a grizzly is confirmed on the edge of Missoula, it will be - for better or for worse - big news. Grizzlies follow black bears who follow the food, and grizzlies become habituated to food sources just like black bears, but their shyness keeps them most often out of sight. If a grizzly is spotted on the edge of Missoula, it will more than likely be a sub-adult, kicked off by its mother that spring. It will be trying to find its way in the world, trying to stay out of the way of older bears by looking for new territory, maybe looking for food after a bad summer. There might already have been grizzlies around the edge of town, feeding on apples and other fruit, ripping into bags of dog food stored on front porches and garages, just no one knew and thought the evidence was from a black bear. There are grizzlies in the Rattlesnake Wilderness, 12 miles north of town. Beyond that are the Mission Mountains Tribal Wilderness to the north with their population of bears, and to the northwest is the North Fork of the Blackfoot, where grizzlies are moving back into their old ranges on the ranches and creeks and bottom-lands. I don't know what will happen when (not if - I think it will happen in the next few years) a grizzly is confirmed in or around Missoula. Will public response demand it be trapped and relocated, even if it hasn't gotten into trouble? It would be an interesting management issue, in that these days, all bears are managed. Black bears are regularly trapped and relocated and put down when they become habituated to food, become unafraid of people. But as soon as the word grizzly appears in print in the local papers, many people will think of only one thing: danger. We all are in much more danger from other critters: I've been chased by moose (never climb a tree to get away from a moose - it will keep you up there for days), and Blue once chased aan agressive white tail out of the back yard. It stalked toward her until she charged, barking and chased it to the fence. It came back twice more before it didn't come back. It wasn't afraid of me, either. I was about to get my can of bear spray to do some averse conditioning if it came back again. People in Missoula remember that a hunter was mauled in the Blackfoot region five years ago. Early on a November morning, a grizzly surprised him as he was gutting an elk. The bear came from behind and he might not have heard it until the last second. According to evidence on the ground, the bear mauled him near the elk, followed him a short distance and attacked again, and then left him alone to crawl toward his truck. His rifle lay near the elk, bolt open. Some yards away he stopped and lay on his back, as if to rest a bit before crawling on, and died. The bear and her two cubs ate some of the elk, and then she partially buried it to mark it as hers. The bears eventually returned a number of times, and by the next day, bear biologists and wardens has set snares. The female and a cub stepped in snares on the third day, returning to the site even though the elk carcass was gone. It was a case of unusual aggression, very rare. The three bears were killed. The DNA evidence and stomach contents of the female were inconclusive. The investigative committee headed by U.S. Fish and Game felt that the bears were the aggressors as they returned to the site, even after the elk carcass was gone. It was the first fatality on the Front or in the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem since 1957. Ten years before that, a sheep herder was mauled and killed near Augusta. There have been fatalities in Glacier Park, which may be due to the higher concentration of both grizzlies and people and as a result they run into each other more often. But the Blackfoot River runs through Missoula, and the incident was less than 40 miles north of town. (I've drawn on articles from The Missoulian for this information; check the Missoulian archives for the full range of articles.) I know hunters who are still apprehensive, and during hunting season head back to their truck at the first sign - tracks, scat, noise - of a bear. Grizzlies have learned that gun shots mean gut piles, and will follow the sound to the site of the kill. They either wait, unseen, until the hunters leave, or, if bold, they move in and take the kill, scaring away the hunter. Outfitters tell stories of bear following their pack strings for miles, following hunters and then walking in and talking an elk. People in Missoula are used to black bears walking into backyards for apples and plums, onto porches after dog food and trash. People in town are used to black bears, sometimes barely stopping to watch when they see a bear on a trail or along the road. When will grizzlies follow, and what will the reaction be? August: Living in Bear Country ≈ September ≈ October: The Scapegoat Wilderness and the Teton If you like what you have read, consider a tax-deductible contribution to me
for a new toner cartridge for my laser printer, which would be great to have for when it next runs out in the middle of printing a draft of this book.
Madel said anyone hunting or recreating this fall needs to take special care in bear country and avoid dense, brushy areas, where they run the risk of surprising a bear bedded down for the day. “The more hunters push into dense riparian cover, the greater their probability of running into grizzly bears,” Madel said. He has also warned homeowners along the Teton River east of Choteau that bears are in the area.
Between the middle of September and the middle of October is the peak of the grizzly conflict season along the Front, Madel said, adding that he expects to receive more calls between now and when the bears den.
The study found there are genetic differences in subpopulations within the ecosystem. The subpopulations with the most distinct DNA makeup were bears on the Rocky Mountain Front and the southern part of the ecosystem, but Kendall said she's not sure why....
It is an important step in measuring the health of the population and its potential for recovery. But the “snapshot” count of 765 bears roaming the 7.2 million acre study area during the summer of 2004 is a long shot from a possible delisting, a process that will depend more on efforts to gauge how the population is trending....
"Clearly, this threatened species has been well cared for by the people of Montana," Hagener said. "These types of conservation success stories come only with the cooperation of the people who share the landscape with wildlife. Montanans can be proud that they’ve made room for the ultimate recovery of this important wildlife species....
Initiated in 2003, the five-year study provides a better understanding of the population size, distribution, and genetic health of grizzly bears in northwest Montana. It is the largest non-invasive study of bears to date and is the first ever ecosystem–wide scientific assessment of grizzlies in the 12,187-square-mile Northern Continental Divide area.



